ST-2 Short-Term Test Report:
In total, we actually tested three different samples.
They are microfiber, sub-microfiber, and a mixed version of the two fibers.
All three fibers demonstrated strong water storage performance, but there are still some differences in touch.
The sample made of sub-microfiber still has very slight scratches, at least you can feel that it is a shaving knot sliding and pressing on your face.
The mixed version of sub-microfiber and microfiber has lighter scratches, almost unnoticeable.
The microfiber has no scratches at all. It is filled with soap and is like a jelly. And because it is very thin, it has a suction effect. Yes, it is like a jelly that can stick to your face, sliding and pressing. This feeling is amazing.
Originally, I thought there would be obvious differences in efficiency, but the actual results are not much different, which I think can be almost ignored.
I was worried that microfibers would have some problems dealing with hard soap, but my concerns were unnecessary. Although microfibers are very soft, their extremely high density and the uneven bionic structure of the hair surface enable them to successfully complete this task, even more efficiently than badger hair, which exceeds my expectations.
I think this is due to two reasons. The first is, of course, related to its bionic structure, and the second is the strong soap-holding ability brought by the ultra-high density.
In terms of foam quality, microfibers can produce denser creams, and these creams will be locked inside the knot, providing a continuous supply, and one foam can complete up to 4-5 Passing.
I think microfibers have surpassed the foam storage capacity of top-level badger hair.
There is also the most crucial indicator, the backbone.
Microfibers can provide a unique touch. As I mentioned before, microfibers filled with soap can wrap around your facial contours.
Yes, it wraps around your facial contours like super soft slime.
However, if you use the traditional backbone to measure the backbone of microfiber, it is naturally not comparable to thicker materials.
But we use extreme density to make up for its disadvantage, and combined with the loft setting, the microfiber can still provide a good backbone.
Maybe you noticed that I didn't describe the experience of the sub-microfiber and hybrid versions in detail. The reason is simple, because the suction effect brought by the microfiber is too fascinating to me.
Although the other two versions also show different degrees of suction effect, the experience provided by the microfiber is the strongest.
Currently, I am basically determined to use microfiber as the final version of ST-2, but we will still provide two versions of ST-2 samples for global testers to experience and compare as much as possible.
Global testing will also commence at the end of this month.
I can't wait to share this product with everyone!
Best regards,
Carry